No TL;DR found
I want to begin by pointing out that all the papers which I am going to discussl have been predominantly concerned with the philosophy of science, rather than with the full range of what Wartofsky calls the &dquo;metasciences.&dquo; I am not making this point as a criticism. It is asking too much of any one author to cover the history, philosophy, and sociology of science in one short paper. Each of the authors has, therefore, wisely cho-