Home / Papers / 051 Stakeholder opinions of telematics as an alternative assessment for MCI...

051 Stakeholder opinions of telematics as an alternative assessment for MCI drivers; a thematic analysis

88 Citations2022
April Douglass, L. Sproson, Vita Lnagranchi
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry

Outcomes suggest that with increased awareness and education around telematics, the older public may accept this technology as an advantageous alternative that could improve road safety as a whole.

Abstract

Background Patients diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) are recommended to have their driving ability assessed to ensure they are not at risk to themselves or other drivers. Current, on-road driving assessments lack ecological validity, being unrepresentative of fluctuations in ability, and lack longitudinal data to assess changes in driving behaviour over time. GPS devices provide an unobtrusive, objective, and continuous form of assessment. This technology has not yet been marketed towards older drivers. Methods Four workshops were conducted with the stakeholders of this project, including older drivers with experience of MCI, clinicians and DVLA representatives. Thematic analysis was conducted on tran- scripts from the workshops to investigate these stakeholders’ opinions of the technology as a potential alternative driving assessment. Results Stakeholders stressed the importance of driving (independence, convenience, sense of freedom), described the issues surrounding the current methods of assessment and discussed the promising nature of telematics technology for older drivers. Discussion Outcomes suggest that with increased awareness and education around telematics, the older public may accept this technology as an advantageous alternative that could improve road safety as a whole.