Sonoporation Using Nanoparticle-Loaded Microbubbles Increases Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles Compared to Co-Incubation of Nanoparticles and Microbubbles
The use of commercial Sonazoid microbubbles leads to significantly lower uptake than when using nanoparticle-loaded microbubbling, suggesting that proximity between cells, nanoparticles and microbubble is important, and that mainly nanoparticles in the shell are taken up, rather than free nanoparticle in solution.
Abstract
Therapeutic agents can benefit from encapsulation in nanoparticles, due to improved pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, protection from degradation, increased cellular uptake and sustained release. Microbubbles in combination with ultrasound have been shown to improve the delivery of nanoparticles and drugs to tumors and across the blood-brain barrier. Here, we evaluate two different microbubbles for enhancing the delivery of polymeric nanoparticles to cells in vitro: a commercially available lipid microbubble (Sonazoid) and a microbubble with a shell composed of protein and nanoparticles. Various ultrasound parameters are applied and confocal microscopy is employed to image cellular uptake. Ultrasound enhanced cellular uptake depending on the pressure and duty cycle. The responsible mechanisms are probably sonoporation and sonoprinting, followed by uptake, and to a smaller degree enhanced endocytosis. The use of commercial Sonazoid microbubbles leads to significantly lower uptake than when using nanoparticle-loaded microbubbles, suggesting that proximity between cells, nanoparticles and microbubbles is important, and that mainly nanoparticles in the shell are taken up, rather than free nanoparticles in solution.