Discover the most influential research papers on the death penalty, exploring its legal, ethical, and societal dimensions. Our curated collection provides critical perspectives and deep insights to broaden your understanding of this complex topic. Perfect for students, researchers, and anyone interested in the implications of capital punishment.
Looking for research-backed answers?Try AI Search
R. Paternoster, Robert W. Brame, S. Bacon + 1 more
journal unavailable
PART I: THE ENDURING LEGACY OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES CHAPTER 1. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE EARLY PERIOD: 1608-1929 CHAPTER 2. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE PRE-MODERN PERIOD: 1930-1967 CHAPTER 3. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE MODERN PERIOD: 1977-PRESENT PART II: LEGAL HISTORY, CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, AND COMMON JUSTIFICATIONS FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES CHAPTER 4. A BRIEF LEGAL HISTORY OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES CHAPTER 5. CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES CHAPTER 6. COMMON JUSTIFICATIONS FOR THE DEATH PENALTY ...
Ethical, philosophical and religious values are central to the continuing controversy over capital punishment. Nevertheless, factual evidence can and should inform policy making. The evidence for capital punishment as an uniquely effective deterrent to murder is especially important, since deterrence is the only major pragmatic argument on the pro-death penalty side.1 The purpose of this paper is to survey and evaluate the evidence for deterrence.
Ethical, philosophical and religious values are central to the continuing controversy over capital punishment. Nevertheless, factual evidence can and should inform policy making. The evidence for capital punishment as an uniquely effective deterrent to murder is especially important, since deterrence is the only major pragmatic argument on the pro-death penalty side.1 The purpose of this paper is to survey and evaluate the evidence for deterrence.
One of the founders of the field of criminology sums up a lifetime of work on the issue of capital punishment. He shows the fallacy of the arguments for the deterrent and retributive value of the death penalty. He argues cogently and passionately for the body of evidence showing that 'abolitionist' states suffer no more capital crime than 'retentionist' ones, and that retribution is neither swift, certain nor equitable. 'This is an impressive book by an established American criminologist...A short review cannot do justice to the careful argument, backed up by detailed evidence, which is contai...
J. Broughton
University of Detroit Mercy School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series
This paper seeks to reexamine, and to reformulate, the terms of our national capital punishment dialogue by approaching death penalty jurisprudence as a problem of constitutional structure and form. As a factor contributing to the incremental demise of capital punishment in the United States, omnipotent and omniscient judicial regulation of capital sentencing has significant consequences for the political institutions responsible for controlling the people in our constitutional design. Examining the Supreme Court's recent categorical exemption cases, this paper confronts the raw moral judgment...
Tara Straka, H. Cucolo, Merrill Rotter + 1 more
Landmark Cases in Forensic Psychiatry
Chapter 26 describes the cases that have defined the evolution of the United States’ relationship with the death penalty. Over time, the country has gradually narrowed the pool of those eligible to be executed, prohibiting the infliction of death on individuals the mental retardation, mental illness, and most, recently, adolescents. These cases are important for forensic professionals who may be involved in the evaluation or treatment of capital defendants. The cases in this chapter are Estelle v. Smith, Ake v. Oklahoma, Ford v. Wainwright, Payne v. Tennessee, State v. Perry, Atkins v. Virgini...
Elizabeth B. Bazan
journal unavailable
With the passage of P.L. 103-322, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, the federal death penalty became available as a possible punishment for a substantial number of new and existing civilian offenses. On April 24, 1996, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 made further modifications and additions to the list of federal capital crimes. On June 25, 2002, P.L. 107-197, the Terrorist Bombings Convention Implementation Act of 2002, added another capital crime to the United States Code. The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, P.L. 10...
From the combination of knowledge and actions, someone can improve their skill and ability and this death penalty tells you that this book will add more knowledge to life and work better.
None of the 20 cases reviewed has suffered facial palsy, apart from four which developed transient weakness immediately post-operatively, presumably due to neurapraxia, which has recurred in the five-year period under review.
It is not reasonable to claim that the lateral position provides the complete answer to a problem which has cleally become one of the utmost gravity, as one who has always used open ether in forceps delivery is in complete agreement with its "supreme safety".
To work, and two months later regained his normal weight, and the patient is still working four years later and apparently in normal health.
S. Howe
journal unavailable
The federal death penalty results in few executions but is central to the larger story of capital punishment in the United States. In the last decade, federal statutes governing the federal death penalty seem to have exerted outsize influence with the Supreme Court in its development of “proportionality” doctrine, the rules by which the Justices confine the use of capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment. In three cases rejecting capital punishment for mentally retarded offenders, juvenile offenders and child rapists, the Court noted that federal death-penalty statutes would have conferre...
Matthew B. Robinson
journal unavailable
There are theoretical and philosophical arguments in favor and against capital punishment. Advocates of capital punishment assert that death is a proper punishment for those who commit the most heinous crimes because offenders owe their lives to society as payment for the harms they inflicted on society (retribution). Further, the death penalty makes us safer by causing fear in would-be murderers so that they do not commit their crimes (deterrence) and by taking away the lives of murderers who might murder again if not executed (incapacitation).
J. Galliher
Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews
ic use. In short, he seeks to join 1950s era functionalism with 1990s era gender theory and social movements theory, with possibly a bit of Jungian psychology thrown in. The attainment of such a vast theoretical project, even if considered separately from its application to the Promise Keepers, is well beyond the scope of Bartkowski’s relatively thin volume. The purpose and perspective of the book thus remain uncertain. Often, the book reads like a draft version that needs another revision or two to clarify the concepts, how they fit together, and how they apply to empirical observation. One p...
Article History Published Online: 15 April 2019 India is known as a creating nation and nowadays crime rates are increasing day by day as well as there are so many legislation in India to stop and control crimes, even though crime rates are increasing because of the non-sufficient punishment of crimes, punishment should be severe in nature for reducing the crime rates in India .All disciplines depend on the motive to give punishment to wrongdoer. There are various types of discipline, for example, the death penalty, life detainment, detainment etc. the most serious type of discipline is known ...
The objective of this research is to find out how Thai academics conducting studies on the question of punishment and practitioners of work related punishment view the issue. The study relies on methods of literature review and brainstorming seminars, divided according to disciplines, and collectively as a general lecture forum. Thai academics participating in the seminar with backgrounds in law, philosophy and religion or political science presented views that were in conjunction with the findings of the research presented culminating in a number of suggestions concerning the necessity and im...
This authoritative, balanced, and accessible reference resource provides readers with a wide-ranging survey of capital punishment in America, including its history, its legal and cultural foundations, and racial and economic factors in its application. This carefully crafted primer on the history and present state of capital punishment in the United States examines cultural, political, and legal factors and developments, as well as key figures, groups, and movements, by consolidating a wide variety of material into a single, convenient source. Utilizing a rich and varied array of scholarship...
(From an address delivered before the American Prison Association at Detroit, Michigan, Oct. 18, 1922.) Three arguments have been advanced for the retention of the death penalty. F33isT. The human need of meeting violence with violence, crime with expiatory vengeance. &dquo;I think it highly desirable that criminals should be hated&dquo;, said Mr. Justice Fitzjames Stephen, and &dquo;that the punishments inflicted upon them should be so contrived as to give expression to that hatred.&dquo;
This essay reviews foundational and cutting-edge social science research on capital punishment. It first describes policy-relevant work on the death penalty as legal punishment, and then provides a brief overview of the more recent contributions on capital punishment and social theory. The scope of relevant scholarship is limited to more empirically based social science scholarship on the American death penalty. Specifically, relative to the longstanding, foundational research on capital punishment, it addresses in order, the research on the deterrent effect of the death penalty; racial inequa...
This authoritative, balanced, and accessible reference resource provides readers with a wide-ranging survey of capital punishment in America, including its history, its legal and cultural foundations, and racial and economic factors in its application. This carefully crafted primer on the history and present state of capital punishment in the United States examines cultural, political, and legal factors and developments, as well as key figures, groups, and movements, by consolidating a wide variety of material into a single, convenient source. Utilizing a rich and varied array of scholarship...