International Trade
No TL;DR found
Abstract
The field of international trade has advanced in the past decade through a healthy exchange between new observations on firms in export markets and new theories that have introduced producer heterogeneity into trade models. As a result, we now have general equilibrium theories of trade that are consistent with various dimensions of both the aggregate and the firmlevel data. Furthermore, we have a much better sense of the magnitudes of key parameters underlying these theories.1 This flurry of activity at the firm level has left the core aggregate relationships among trade, factor costs, and welfare largely untouched, however. Although we now have much better microfoundations for aggregate trade models, their predictions are much like those of the Armington model – for years a workhorse of quantitative international trade. Arkolakis, Costinot, and Rodrı́guez-Clare (2012) emphasized this (lack of) implication of the recent literature for aggregate trade. We argue that a primary reason why models of heterogeneous producers deliver so little in the way of modification of how we think about aggregates is the device – initiated in the trade literature by Dornbusch, Fischer, and Samuelson (1977) – of treating the set of products as a continuum.