No TL;DR found
Perhaps less significant (and generally less popular) are such techniques as the parable, anecdote, field trip, panel, exhibition, etc. For the most part, the reports of actual practice tended to approximate rather well what the instructors indicated as &dquo;ideal&dquo;-a situation not exactly commonplace in higher education today. The tendency, in 1948 at least, was toward a rather significant allocation of time to the informal lecture and the discussion (5’0 per cent and more) and, what is to me surprising, about 10 per cent to the formal lec-