With a Novel
Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available and the randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches is studied.
Abstract
1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, Van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the ACCESS study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1269–75. 2. Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Guillermo Aldama-López, Belén Cid-Álvarez, Pablo PiñónEsteban, Diego López-Otero, Ramón Calviño-Santos. et al. Acceso radial frente a femoral después de una intervención coronaria percutánea en infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST. Resultados de mortalidad a 30 dı́as y a 1 año. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2013;66:871–8. 3. Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Dharma S, Petkoska D. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:51–60. 4. Kwan TW, Ratcliffe JA, Chaudhry M, Huang Y, Wong S, Zhou X, et al. Transulnar catheterization in patients with ipsilateral radial artery occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:849–55.