Top Research Papers on Google Scholar

Researchers, academics, students and librarians are facing an increasingly ardent task of searching through multiple sources to find relevant information, and Google Scholar provides the advantage of searching all available scholarly work from one single interface.

¿Qué es Google académico? Servicio de Google especializado en la búsqueda de contenido bibliográfico, académico y científico.

Google Scholar produces scholarly results based on such factors as the number of citations, author, and text, which means your results are going to be acceptable as college level sources.

Purpose This paper aims to identify the scholarly nature of the results retrieved by the Google Scholar on the five major global problems, i.e. global warming, economic recession, terrorism, HIV AIDS and child labour. Design/methodology/approach The five terms (global warming, economic recession, terrorism, HIV AIDS and child labour) were searched into the Google Scholar database, and the first 50 retrieved hits were manually analysed to record the relevant bibliographic details. The scholarship of the results was measured by quality indices like h-index, Altmetrics and Journal Impact Facto...

What does Google Scholar include? Google Scholar www.scholar.google.com provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. From one place, you can search across many disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions, from academic publishers, professional societies, online repositories, universities and other web sites. Google Scholar helps you find relevant work across the world of scholarly research.

This week I was finishing up a gran proposal and working on my list of references. My usual strategy is to search Google Scholar to see

ABSTRACT This article uses data collected from Google Scholar to identify characteristics of scholars who have chosen to create a Google Scholar profile. Among tenured and tenure-track faculty with full-time appointments in PhD-granting political science departments, we find that only 43.7% have created a profile. However, among R1 faculty, young and early-career faculty are more likely to have Google Scholar profiles than those in older cohorts. Although subfield differences are largely nonexistent, there is a notably low proportion of theory faculty with profiles and a slightly higher propor...

A primer explains how GSC works and compares GSC profiles with Social Science Research Network (SSRN) author pages.

To Google Scholar Citations προσφέρει στους ερευνητές τη δυνατότητα να δημιουργήσουν το δικό τους προφίλ (author profile) χρησι­ μοποιώντας το gmail λογαριασμό τους και να υπολογίσουν τις αναφορές που έγιναν στα έργα τους, το h-index και το ί 10 index. Μπο­ ρούν επίσης να δημοσιεύσουν το προφίλ με τις δημοσιεύσεις τους, ώστε να μπορεί να εμ­ φανίζεται στα αποτελέσματα αναζήτησης του Google Scholar κάθε φορά που κάποιος κάνει αναζήτηση με όνομα συγγραφέα.

The paper provides intimately the features, search strategies, citation indexing values of Google Scholar.

The Google Books project has given a massive and valuable boost to the already rich and diverse content of Google Scholar, but significant gaps remain for top ranking journals and serials, and the number of duplicate, triplicate and quadruplicate records for the same source documents has increased.

Subsidiary text version of a lecture held at the Department of Library and Information Science/Humboldt-University to Berlin on January 2nd 2006.

This study examined and disclosed how academics viewed Google Scholar in general, how they used it, both the benefits that they felt they had received from, alongside the kinds of issues that faced while using it.

Reviews the Google Scholar Internet search engine from Google.

The paper provides a detail history and development timeline of Google and Google Scholar and discusses in detail the features, search strategies, citation indexing values of Google Scholar.

The purpose of this paper is to show the benefits of academic ranking of universities, faculties, professors, and researchers, as well as to get a clear picture of the degree of citation of the professors, specifically on the Google Scholar platform, while explaining the level of the faculties and universities.

All recent publications of all members of the German Academic Association for Business Research (VHB) and among the researchers, the citations are distributed highly unequal and follow Pareto’s Law: Few scholars gather a large part of all citations.

The paper addresses the problem of optimal operation of a resource-constrained sampler that wishes to track multiple independent counting processes in a way that is as up to date as possible.

Google Scholar, while a substantive supplementary research tool, does not provide the same quality in terms of relevance for many research topics, compared to subscription databases and the library catalog.

ABSTRACT Google Scholar (GS) is an important tool that faculty, administrators, and external reviewers use to evaluate the scholarly impact of candidates for jobs, tenure, and promotion. This article highlights both the benefits of GS—including the reliability and consistency of its citation counts and its platform for disseminating scholarship and facilitating networking—and its pitfalls. GS has biases because citation is a social and political process that disadvantages certain groups, including women, younger scholars, scholars in smaller research communities, and scholars opting for risky ...