亲眼看看 Paperguide 如何融入您团队的研究工作流
了解您的团队如何在一个互联工作区中查找、组织和综合研究文献，并携手开展严谨、可审计的系统综述。
974,000+ 研究人员信赖之选，包括全球顶尖机构的团队
经得起检验的研究，从第一次检索到带引用的草稿
以下一切都在一个互联工作区中完成，围绕您自己的研究问题展开。
- 从 Zotero 或 Mendeley 导入，或通过 DOI 添加论文，元数据和开放获取 PDF 自动为您获取。
- 阅读、标注论文，笔记随论文保存，跨项目通用。
- 向您的文献库提问，通过研究助手获得有引用支撑的答案。
- 每篇保存的论文都可用于搜索、综述、数据提取和写作。
In practice
<1 weekfor a 2,000-paper PRISMA review
A 2,000-paper PRISMA review screened and extracted in a fraction of the time, without loosening the criteria.Read case study
6 weeksfor a review that took 3 months
A meta-analysis that surfaced contradictions a manual review would have missed, in half the time.Read case study
~60%faster screening cycles
Dual-screened SLR screening cut from about three weeks to one, with independent review and PRISMA intact.Read case study
Every decisionlogged with its criterion and evidence
CER literature reviews where every exclusion maps to a criterion an auditor can follow, with a complete decision log built in.Read case study
研究者怎么说
Paperguide not only enables the search for scientific articles but also provides a comprehensive systematic evaluation of the search results... it leads to significant time savings and better results, because one is "forced" to adopt a systematic approach from the start.
Matthias R.Lecturer, LfBA
The demo ran a full review on our own topic. Seeing the dual screening and the PRISMA output on a real question is what convinced the team to move.
Karin V.Head of Evidence Synthesis
We deliver more reviews per analyst than we did a year ago. Screening and extraction used to eat the timeline; now they are the fastest parts, and that shows up directly in how many client projects we can take on.
Jonas W.Director of Evidence Synthesis
When an auditor asks why a study was excluded, the answer is one click away: the criterion, the evidence, and the person who confirmed it. We stopped rebuilding the audit trail at the end of every review.
Daniel K.Clinical Evidence Lead