Organizational identification and organizational commitment: Distinct aspects of two related concepts
Asian Journal Of Social PsychologyPublished 28 October 2004Open access
Thaneswor Gautam, Rolf van Dick, Ulrich Wagner
Citations305
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.85
SNIP1.08
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The conceptual differences between organizational commitment and identification are discussed theoretically and examined empirically. The present study is based on data of 450 employees of five different organizations in Nepal. A revised eight‐item scale was designed out of Cheney’s Organizational Identification Questionnaire to assess the core aspects of organizational identification. In confirmatory factor analyses, identification was found to be distinguishable from four related commitment concepts (i.e. affective, continuance, normative, and attitudinal commitment).
Keywords
Business, Management and Accounting
