One research platform for your whole institution
Give every researcher, lab, and department one AI-native workspace to find, organize, and synthesize literature, and to run rigorous, auditable systematic reviews. With institution-wide access, admin, and roles built in.
Your researchers already use a dozen tools. None of them talk to each other.
Across your institution, researchers stitch together a search engine, a PDF reader, a spreadsheet, a reference manager, and a writing tool, each licensed, supported, and secured separately, if at all. Libraries field the same requests, labs keep diverging copies of the same papers, and no one can see or standardize how research actually gets done.
- Multiple overlapping tool licenses, with gaps the library ends up covering.
- No shared, connected workflow across labs, departments, or cohorts.
- Systematic reviews run ad hoc, with no consistent, auditable method.
- Access, roles, and security handled tool by tool, not centrally.
One workspace, from a single researcher to the whole institution
Paperguide connects the research workflow for every researcher, and gives the institution the access, administration, and oversight to run it at scale.
Equip every researcher
One connected workspace for search, review, extraction, and writing.Organize by lab and department
Shared workspaces and libraries that belong to the group, not one account.Standardize systematic reviews
A consistent, auditable review method across teams and cohorts.Administer centrally
SSO, roles, and workspace access managed in one place.Support and procure once
A single platform to license, secure, and support.
What institutions use it for
Library and Research Office
Consolidate research tooling
Support systematic review services
Provide institution-wide literature access
Departments and Graduate Schools
Standardize the research workflow
Equip a graduate cohort
Run publishable systematic reviews
Research Institutes and Core Facilities
Support many research groups
Keep evidence work defensible
Built for how institutions buy, secure, and administer
The individual researcher gets a connected workflow. The institution gets the access, control, and defensibility it needs to stand behind it.
Institution-wide access
Seats and workspaces across departments, labs, and cohorts, managed centrally.
SSO and role-based access
Single sign-on and roles that decide who can edit, review, or read in each workspace.
Shared workspaces, private space
Papers, reviews, and documents belong to the group; every member keeps a private space too.
Auditable systematic reviews
A consistent, documented review method with sentence-level evidence, so institutional output holds up to peer review and audit.
Citation-grounded across the platform
Every AI answer, screening decision, and extracted value links to the exact statement in the source.
200M+ peer-reviewed papers
Across PubMed, arXiv, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar, alongside your researchers' own libraries.
One platform to support
A single license, security review, and support relationship instead of many.
One workspace, every research tool your people reach for
AI Search
Systematic Review
Reference Manager
Extract Data
AI Writer
Research Agent
Chat with PDF
Case Studies
Supervising more theses across more fields, with reviews that stay structured and cited.Read case study
A 2,000-paper PRISMA review screened and extracted in a fraction of the time, without loosening the criteria.Read case study
A dual-screened, PRISMA-documented review a small lab can run and a journal will accept.Read case study
A dissertation literature review that stays connected from first search to cited draft, in one workspace.Read case study
Testimonials
The citation feature saves me a lot of time, and I can work with my colleagues in the same projects. The research tools help me find good sources quickly.
Our group kept five diverging libraries before Paperguide. One shared workspace fixed that: everyone annotates the same papers, and our reviews and writing pull from the same source.
Two students screened independently and a supervisor resolved the conflicts, exactly how a review team should work. The PRISMA numbers came straight from the workflow, so the methods section almost wrote itself.
The per-criterion evidence changed how our reviewers work. It cut our abstract screening from about three weeks to one, and the decisions came out more consistent, not less.
Ready for your procurement and security review
SSO and role-based access, workspace-level access control, and central admin for seats, roles, and usage.
Coming soon: GDPR, SOC 2, and ISO 27001.
Bring one research platform to your institution
Book a demo and we'll show how Paperguide works across your labs, departments, and researchers, with the access, admin, and defensibility your institution needs.