For Academic Researchers

From your research question to a cited manuscript, in one place

Search the literature, run a systematic review, extract data, and write with citations, without switching between a search engine, a PDF folder, a spreadsheet, and a reference manager. Every answer is citation-grounded, traceable to the paper it came from, so your work holds up to a supervisor, a reviewer, or an examiner.

Trusted by 974,000+ researchers, from graduate students to faculty.
MITUniversity of OxfordUC BerkeleyThe University of MelbourneNYUUCLADuke UniversityUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Your research lives in five tools, and the deadlines don't care

A search engine for finding papers. A folder of PDFs. A spreadsheet for extraction. A reference manager. A document where the writing happens. None of them talk to each other, and the context you build in one is lost in the next, while the qualifying exam, the submission, or the grant deadline stays fixed.

  • Papers found in search don't carry into your library, your review, or your writing.
  • A literature review means re-reading dozens of papers with no structured way to synthesize them.
  • Extraction for a review or meta-analysis happens by hand, in a spreadsheet, with citations added later.
  • Students and collaborators each build their own diverging copy of the same library.

One workspace for the whole arc of a research project

A research project runs from a first question to a defended document. Paperguide connects every stage, so nothing is lost between them.

  • Explore

    Find papers and get cited answers on an unfamiliar question or field.
  • Review

    Run a literature review or a formal systematic review with synthesized, cited findings.
  • Extract

    Pull structured data from papers into evidence tables for a review or meta-analysis.
  • Write

    Draft chapters, articles, and reviews with citations applied from your own evidence.
  • Collaborate

    Share a library and a workspace across a lab, supervisor, and co-authors.

What researchers use it for

Real tasks across a research project, from a first question to a cited manuscript. Each one keeps every claim traceable to the paper it came from.

Getting Oriented in a Field

Map an unfamiliar field

Ask a plain-language question and get a cited synthesis, then let the Research Agent map the themes, agreements, and gaps.
Cited answer

Check if a question's been answered

Find existing reviews and meta-analyses before you commit to a project.
Cited answer

Find seminal and recent work

Surface both foundational and latest papers on a topic in one pass.
Cited answer

Literature Review (Thesis, Article, Grant)

Generate a synthesized review

Set the protocol first, screen against criteria, and get a themed, cited review across up to 50 papers, a working draft for a chapter or article.
Screening setExtraction table

Build a background chapter

Get the state of research on your topic, organized and cited, for a dissertation introduction.
Cited answer

Justify a grant's premise

Identify and cite the evidence gaps your proposal addresses.
Cited answer

Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

Run a publishable systematic review

Use dual review, students screen independently, a supervisor resolves conflicts, extraction is verified, and PRISMA is generated, to journal standard.
Screening setExtraction table

Extract data for meta-analysis

Pull effect sizes and sample sizes into a cited table, ready to export.
Extraction table

Screen a large abstract set

Screen thousands of abstracts against your eligibility criteria for a scoping or systematic review.
Screening set

Deep Reading & Analysis

Understand a dense paper

Ask a paper directly about its methods, assumptions, and findings.
Cited answer

Compare studies head to head

Chat across several PDFs at once to compare designs and results.
Cited answer

Writing & Citing

Draft with citations applied

Draft a related-work section from your own library, with citations placed as it writes.
Cited answer

Reformat for a target journal

Switch every citation to a journal's required style in one step.
Cited answer

Work that holds up to a reviewer, a supervisor, or an examiner

Academic work gets scrutinized, in peer review, a viva, or a methods section. These are the mechanics that make Paperguide's output defensible.

  • Every claim traces to a statement

    Answers, review findings, extracted values, and drafted text all link back to the source, down to the sentence, so nothing in your work is unattributed.

  • A real systematic-review method

    Protocol first, documented screening with criteria, verified extraction, PRISMA, the process an examiner or journal expects, not a chat summary.

  • Human control over every review decision

    In dual review, students screen independently and a supervisor resolves conflicts; every decision is on record.

  • Evidence quality made visible

    Journal quartile, SJR, SNIP, and citation signals help you weigh a source before you cite it.

  • Citations you don't hand-fix

    Generated text carries its citations; 1,000+ styles switch without reformatting by hand.

  • Your library, connected

    Import from Zotero or Mendeley, and every saved paper feeds search, review, extraction, and writing.

  • 200M+ peer-reviewed papers

    Across PubMed, arXiv, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar, spanning disciplines.

Case Studies

Dr. Hasan Bulut
2-3×more research areas monitored
Supervising more theses across more fields, with reviews that stay structured and cited.
Read case study
Diego Cesar
<1 weekfor a 2,000-paper PRISMA review
A 2,000-paper PRISMA review screened and extracted in a fraction of the time, without loosening the criteria.
Read case study
Mustafa Vohra
faster paper analysis
Three separate tools became one workspace, so reading, extracting, and comparing papers happens in a single pass.
Read case study
Dr. Priya Nair
Journal-standardreview from a six-person lab
A dual-screened, PRISMA-documented review a small lab can run and a journal will accept.
Read case study
Tom Bergström
5 tools to 1across the dissertation workflow
A dissertation literature review that stays connected from first search to cited draft, in one workspace.
Read case study

Testimonials

Paperguide not only enables the search for scientific articles but also provides a comprehensive systematic evaluation of the search results... it leads to significant time savings and better results, because one is "forced" to adopt a systematic approach from the start.
M
Matthias R.Lecturer, LfBA
Paperguide search, literature review and writer tools have made my research so much easier. I can complete my whole research in Paperguide, without even switching to Google Scholar and ChatGPT.
G
Gibbs H.Researcher
The related-work section drafts from my own library with the citations already attached. I spend my time editing the argument, not hunting references.
L
Laura M.PhD Candidate
The per-criterion evidence changed how our reviewers work. It cut our abstract screening from about three weeks to one, and the decisions came out more consistent, not less.
P
Priya N.Systematic Review Manager

Bringing Paperguide to a whole department or university?

Site-wide access, shared workspaces, admin controls, and procurement are covered on our Research Institutions page.

Start with the question you've been carrying around

Ask something you've been meaning to look into. Paperguide will find the papers, and you can take it as far as the work needs.