See Paperguide on your team's research workflow
See how your team finds, organizes, and synthesizes research in one connected workspace, and runs rigorous, auditable systematic reviews together.
Trusted by 974,000+ researchers, including teams at leading institutions worldwide








Research that holds up, from first search to cited draft
Everything below runs in one connected workspace, on your own research question.
- Import from Zotero or Mendeley, or add papers by DOI, and metadata and open-access PDFs are fetched for you.
- Read, annotate, and keep notes attached to each paper, across projects.
- Ask your library questions and get citation-grounded answers through the Research Agent.
- Every paper you save is available to search, review, extraction, and writing.

In practice

<1 weekfor a 2,000-paper PRISMA review
A 2,000-paper PRISMA review screened and extracted in a fraction of the time, without loosening the criteria.Read case study

6 weeksfor a review that took 3 months
A meta-analysis that surfaced contradictions a manual review would have missed, in half the time.Read case study

~60%faster screening cycles
Dual-screened SLR screening cut from about three weeks to one, with independent review and PRISMA intact.Read case study

Every decisionlogged with its criterion and evidence
CER literature reviews where every exclusion maps to a criterion an auditor can follow, with a complete decision log built in.Read case study
What researchers say
Paperguide not only enables the search for scientific articles but also provides a comprehensive systematic evaluation of the search results... it leads to significant time savings and better results, because one is "forced" to adopt a systematic approach from the start.
Matthias R.Lecturer, LfBA
The demo ran a full review on our own topic. Seeing the dual screening and the PRISMA output on a real question is what convinced the team to move.
Karin V.Head of Evidence Synthesis
We deliver more reviews per analyst than we did a year ago. Screening and extraction used to eat the timeline; now they are the fastest parts, and that shows up directly in how many client projects we can take on.
Jonas W.Director of Evidence Synthesis
When an auditor asks why a study was excluded, the answer is one click away: the criterion, the evidence, and the person who confirmed it. We stopped rebuilding the audit trail at the end of every review.
Daniel K.Clinical Evidence Lead
Start with a question
Ask something you have been meaning to look into. Paperguide will find the papers, and you can take it as far as the work needs.