Read and make sense of the literature with one agent
One agent that reads, questions, and reviews the literature with you, from a single PDF to a full review, with every answer grounded in the source and cited to the sentence.
One agent, three ways to work
Chat with PDF
Open a paper in a dedicated reader with the chat beside it, and ask about methods, results, or conclusions. Question one paper or several at once, with answers cited to the sentence in the PDF. Example: “What was the primary outcome, and was it statistically significant?”
Research Agent
Run a multi-step investigation across 200M+ papers and your library. Explore a topic, follow the thread, and surface the patterns and gaps in a field.
Literature Review Report
Get a synthesized report on what the research says, from the 200M+ database or the papers in your reference manager, so you reach a broad understanding fast. Example: “Current evidence on mindfulness interventions for adolescent anxiety.”
It carries a piece of research forward, not just answers a question
The agent stays in the loop from the first search to a first draft, so you move a project along without switching tools.
- Find the papers relevant to a question, fast.
- Compare methods, findings, and conclusions to see where studies agree and clash.
- Analyze and make sense of data across papers.
- Get writing assistance grounded in your sources.
A quick review you can trust
The report is more than a summary. It shows its work and grounds every claim.
Screening and extraction included
The report carries the screening data and extracted data behind it, not just the write-up.
Synthesized, not listed
See where the evidence converges, where it conflicts, and what it leaves open, with the limitations noted.
Citation-grounded
Every claim in the report is drawn from and cited to real papers.
From your library or the literature
Run it on papers you have collected, or across the full database.
One agent for every kind of research team
Evidence-synthesis consultancies and CROs
Medical device and diagnostics teams
Academic and clinical researchers
Public health and policy teams
What researchers say
I open a dense methods paper, ask what the primary outcome was and whether it was significant, and get the answer cited to the exact line. I understand a paper in minutes, not an hour.
I asked it to compare the methods across four studies and it showed me where they agreed and where they clashed, with sources. That comparison would have taken me a day by hand.
I asked for a review of my topic and got a synthesized, cited report that mapped the gaps. It became the backbone of my research proposal.
It finds papers, compares findings, and helps me draft, all grounded in the sources. It is the closest thing to a research partner I have used.