login

Collective beliefs versus individual inflexibility: The unavoidable biases of a public debate

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsPublished 19 April 2011
Serge Galam
Citations39
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.67
SNIP1.08

Abstract

The combined effects of collective beliefs and individual inflexibility in the dynamics of a public debate are investigated using the Galam sequential probabilistic model of opinion dynamics. The study is focused on pair interactions for which the bias produced by collective beliefs is the decisive factor to win the debate. The current value of that bias is a fixed external parameter. It is a constant of the problem not given to change. In contrast, inflexibility is an individual property. It results from external ingredients, which are susceptible to be modified during the debate. More precisely, giving some beliefs we determine the required inflexibility to oppose its associated bias in the debate outcome. The results shed a new and counter intuitive light on paradoxical outcomes of sensitive issues, which are discussed in the public. The cases of global warming issue and debate over evolution are discussed.

Keywords

Social SciencesPhysics and Astronomy