Are There Rival, Incommensurable Theories?
Philosophy of SciencePublished 1 June 1979
Dale W. Moberg
Citations14
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.69
SNIP0.82
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Following an account of the incommensurability argument, an objection, based on assumptions concerning rival theories, is examined and rejected. This rejection leads to an alternative direction of criticism of incommensurability, a direction that involves the articulation of comparative standards of theory evaluation that are independent of meaning invariance.
Keywords
PsychologyArts and Humanities
Physics Today<i>The Principles of Quantum Mechanics</i>
5,171 Citations1958P. A. M. Dirac, J. C. Polkinghorne
Cambridge University Press eBooksExplanation, reduction and empiricism
624 Citations1981Paul K. Feyerabend
The Justification of Scientific Change
136 Citations1971Carl R. Kordig
