Marketing Mix Reactions to Entry
Marketing SciencePublished 1 November 1988
William T. Robinson
Citations176
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score7.54
SNIP2.65
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Initial product, distribution, marketing expenditure, and price reactions by incumbents are examined for 115 entrants into oligopolistic markets. The most common reaction pattern is either no reaction or only a single reaction. It is very unusual for entrants to face reactions across the entire marketing mix. Reactions in the first two years after entry are explained as a function of the entrant's strategy, incumbent characteristics, and industry characteristics. The explanation provides insights into why marketing mix reactions to entry are often limited.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and FinanceBusiness, Management and Accounting
EconometricaA Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity
26,139 Citations1980Halbert White
Marketing management: analysis. planning. implementation and control
6,701 Citations2000Philip Kotler
The Journal of FinanceIndustrial Market Structure and Economic Performance.
6,393 Citations1971H. Michael Mann, F. M. Scherer
BiometrikaTESTING FOR SERIAL CORRELATION IN LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION. II
3,638 Citations1951J. Durbin, G. S. Watson
Journal of Economic TheoryReputation and imperfect information
3,143 Citations1982David M. Kreps, Robert Wilson
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsFrom Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition*
2,028 Citations1977Richard E. Caves, Michael E. Porter
Journal of Economic TheoryPredation, reputation, and entry deterrence
1,867 Citations1982Paul Milgrom, John Roberts
EconometricaTesting for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent Variables
1,186 Citations1970J. Durbin
The Bell Journal of EconomicsEntry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing
1,167 Citations1977A. Michael Spence
Journal of Marketing ResearchSources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries
598 Citations1985William T. Robinson, Claes Fornell
Management ScienceMarket Share Rewards to Pioneering Brands: An Empirical Analysis and Strategic Implications
589 Citations1986Glen L. Urban, Theresa Carter +2 more
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationA New Test for Heteroskedasticity
544 Citations1969H. Glejser
Journal of Marketing ResearchSources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries
332 Citations1988William T. Robinson
Academy of Management ReviewCorporate Diversification: Entry, Strategy, and Performance
265 Citations1984James J. Chrisman, Charles W. Hofer +1 more
The Review of Economic StudiesPrice Setting Supergames with Capacity Constraints
240 Citations1985William A. Brock, José Scheinkman
Strategic Management JournalThe perils of high‐growth markets
193 Citations1986David A. Aaker, George S. Day
Journal of the Operational Research SocietyBarriers to Entry — A Corporate Strategy Perspective
129 Citations1983M. John Foster
Journal of Political EconomyEntry, Industry Growth, and the Microdynamics of Industry Supply
123 Citations1984John C. Hause, Gunnar Du Rietz
The Review of Economics and StatisticsThe Effect of Diversification on Industry Profit Performance in 241 Manufacturing Industries: 1963
102 Citations1973Stephen A. Rhoades
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsThe Decline of Dominant Firms, 1905-1929
66 Citations1984Richard E. Caves, Michael William-Patrick Fortunato +1 more
International Marketing ReviewJAPANESE MARKET ENTRY STRATEGY AT WORK: KOMATSU vs. CATERPILLAR
10 Citations1986J. Taylor Sims
