Paternalism and medical ethics.
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
In one of a series of articles on philosophical medical ethics, Gillon considers various moral arguments in support of medical paternalism and concludes that many utilitarians agree with deontologists that respect for autonomy is required if human welfare really is to be maximized.
Abstract
In one of a series of articles on philosophical medical ethics,\nGillon considers various moral arguments in support of medical paternalism. \nHe maintains that the utilitarian principle of maximizing happiness by\nimproving health, minimizing suffering, and prolonging life is not promoted by\ngranting physicians the authority to deceive patients or to make decisions for\nthem in areas of moral and subjective choice. If one wants to do good for a\npatient, one generally needs to find out what the patient wants one to do. \nGillon concludes that many utilitarians agree with deontologists that respect\nfor autonomy is required if human welfare really is to be maximized. (KIE\nabstract)
