Generating and validating abstracts of meeting conversations: a user study
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
It is found that the automatically generated summaries are ranked significantly higher than human-selected extracts on coherence and usability criteria, and more generally, users demonstrate a strong preference for abstract-style summaries over extracts.
Abstract
In this paper we present a complete system for automatically generating natural language abstracts of meeting conversations. This system is comprised of components relating to interpretation of the meeting documents according to a meeting ontology, transformation or content selection from that source representation to a summary representation, and generation of new summary text. In a formative user study, we compare this approach to gold-standard human abstracts and extracts to gauge the usefulness of the different summary types for browsing meeting conversations. We find that our automatically generated summaries are ranked significantly higher than human-selected extracts on coherence and usability criteria. More generally, users demonstrate a strong preference for abstract-style summaries over extracts. 1
