Correspondence analysis: An alternative to principal components
World ArchaeologyPublished 1 June 1982
Erik Bølviken, Ericka Helskog, Knut Helskog, Inger Marie Holm‐Olsen, Leiv Solheim, Reidar Bertelsen
Citations80
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.68
SNIP0.89
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract Correspondence analysis is put forward as a statistical tool of the data reduction type, useful for abundance data. The method is applied to three research examples from the archaeology of northern Norway. It is pointed out that the method can be used as a device for automatic seriation.
Keywords
Computer Science
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationMethods for Statistical Data Analysis of Multivariate Observations.
900 Citations1978Pranab Kumar Sen, R. Gnanadesikan
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method
833 Citations1974M. O. Hill
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical SocietyA Connection between Correlation and Contingency
553 Citations1935H. O. Hirschfeld
The South African Archaeological BulletinPrinciples of Archaeological Stratigraphy
467 Citations1981A. J. B. Humphreys, Edward C. Harris
The South African Archaeological BulletinMathematics and Computers in Archaeology
206 Citations1976Thomas P. Volman, J. Doran +1 more
This book offers an introductory survey of all the applications of mathematical and statistical techniques to archaeology, and permits an assessment of its relevance and quality.
American AntiquityOn the “Making” of an Assemblage of Stone Tools
89 Citations1974Albert J. Ammerman, Marcus W. Feldman
A formal model is developed which includes variables such as activities and tool types and also draws attention to somewhat less visible variables that enter into the formation of an assemblage such as the dropping rates of tools and mapping relations between tooltypes and activities.
Norwegian Archaeological ReviewFarm mounds in North Norway, a review of recent research
30 Citations1979Reidar Bertelsen
World ArchaeologyComparing palaeolithic assemblages: Ksar akil, a case study
12 Citations1973Ingrid Azoury, F. R. Hodson