The effects of restraint and noncontingent preshock on subsequent escape learning in the rat

Learning and MotivationPublished 1 February 1974

Robert J. Bracewell, A. H. Black

DOI10.1016/0023-9690(74)90037-x

Source URL

Citations105

SJR quartileQ2

SJR score0.46

SNIP0.95

TL;DR

Three experiments investigated the effects of restraint and of inescapable fixed duration preshocks on subsequent shuttlebox escape-from-shock learning and found no effects were found for low fixed-intensity or random-intensity preshock nor for a condition in which movement was rewarded during Preshock.

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the effects of restraint and of inescapable fixed duration preshocks on subsequent shuttlebox escape-from-shock learning. Fixed-intensity preshock, random-intensity preshock, and no-preshock conditions were included in each experiment. In Experiment 1, restraining the rat in a harness prior to escape training retarded escape acquisition. There was no effect of preshock. In Experiment 2, both restraint and high fixed-intensity (1.0 mA) preshock retarded escape acquisition, when escape training occurred either immediately or 24 hr after preshock. In Experiment 3, movement was punished by positively correlating preshock intensity with the rat's movement; this treatment retarded escape conditioning. No effects were found for low fixed-intensity or random-intensity preshock nor for a condition in which movement was rewarded during preshock. The retarding effects of restraint and certain types of preshock were explained in terms of interfering instrumental responses.

Keywords

NeuroscienceBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Journal of Experimental PsychologyFailure to escape traumatic shock.

1,913 Citations1967Martin E. P. Seligman, Steven F. Maier

Dogs which had first learned to panel press in a harness in order to escape shock subsequently showed normal acquisition of escape/ avoidance behavior in a shuttle box, supporting a learned "helplessness" explanation of interference with escape responding.

Journal of Comparative and Physiological PsychologyEffects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding.

1,184 Citations1967J. Bruce Overmier, Martin E. P. Seligman

Exposure of dogs to inescapable shocks under a variety of conditions reliably interfered with subsequent instrumental escape-avoidance responding in a new situation, indicating that interference is not due to acquisition, during the period of exposure to in unavoidable shocks, of inappropriate, competing instrumental responses.

Elsevier eBooksUnpredictable and Uncontrollable Aversive Events

456 Citations1971Martin E. P. Seligman, Steven F. Maier +1 more

A two-dimensional representation of the operations involved in instrumental training and Pavlovian conditioning is described, which discusses the current status of research and theory concerning these phenomena.

Journal of Comparative and Physiological PsychologyEffects of coping behavior in different warning signal conditions on stress pathology in rats.

394 Citations1971Jay M. Weiss

Rats received electric shock that was preceded by either a warning signal, a series of signals forming an "external clock," or no signal at all, and subjects which could avoid and/or escape shock developed less ulceration than yoked "helpless" animals which received exactly the same shock but had no control over shock.

Learning and MotivationFailure to escape traumatic electric shock: Incompatible skeletal-motor responses or learned helplessness?

91 Citations1970Steven F. Maier

Ten dogs, the passive DRO (differential reinforcement of other behavior) group, were trained to escape electric shock in a Pavlov harness by inhibiting the head movements normally elicited by that electric shock by reducing the intensity of the shock.