Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions
Journal of Risk and UncertaintyPublished 1 August 1993
Eric J. Johnson, John C. Hershey, Jacqueline Meszaros, Howard Kunreuther
Citations734
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.79
SNIP1.05
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
A series of studies examines whether certain biases in probability assessments and perceptions of loss, previously found in experimental studies, affect consumers' decisions about insurance. Framing manipulations lead the consumers studied here to make hypothetical insurance-purchase choices that violate basic laws of probability and value. Subjects exhibit distortions in their perception of risk and framing effects in evaluating premiums and benefits. Illustrations from insurance markets suggest that the same effects occur when consumers make actual insurance purchases.
Keywords
Decision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and FinanceNeuroscience
EconometricaProspect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
47,019 Citations1979Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky
ScienceThe Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
17,311 Citations1981Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
The psychological principles that govern the perception of decision problems and the evaluation of probabilities and outcomes produce predictable shifts of preference when the same problem is framed in different ways.
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsLoss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model
6,442 Citations1991Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
Journal of Risk and UncertaintyStatus quo bias in decision making
5,866 Citations1988William Samuelson, Richard Zeckhauser
Psychological ReviewExtensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
3,902 Citations1983Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
Journal of Political EconomyExperimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
3,144 Citations1990Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch +1 more
Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementValuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction
1,948 Citations1992Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch
Journal of Risk and UncertaintyStatus-quo and omission biases
622 Citations1992Ilana Ritov, Jonathan Baron
Journal of Risk and UncertaintyJournal of Risk and Uncertainty
360 Citations2013Christoph M. Rheinberger, James K. Hammitt +121 more
Management ScienceSources of Bias in Assessment Procedures for Utility Functions
305 Citations1982John C. Hershey, Howard Kunreuther +1 more
Journal of Risk & InsuranceRisk Taking and Problem Context in the Domain of Losses: An Expected Utility Analysis
277 Citations1980John C. Hershey, Paul J. H. Schoemaker
The Journal of BusinessThe Selection of an Optimal Deductible for a Given Insurance Policy
132 Citations1966B. Peter Pashigian, Lawrence L. Schkade +1 more
Hübner international series on risk, insurance, and economic securityFoundations of Insurance Economics
55 Citations1992Georges Dionne, Scott E. Harrington
Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care (American Economic Review, 1963)
9 Citations2001Kenneth Joseph Arrow
