The Social Benefits of Resident Involvement in Tree Planting
Arboriculture & Urban ForestryPublished 1 May 1994Open access
Robert Sommer, Fred Learey, Joshua Summit, Matthew Tirrell
Citations53
SJR quartileQ3
SJR score0.24
SNIP0.33
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract City residents who planted their own street trees were more satisfied with the outcome than residents whose trees were planted by the city or an outside agency. Within the circumstances described in the study, those residents who paid for their trees were more satisfied with the outcomes than those who received them without extra charge from the city or from a voluntary organization. The results underscore the importance of active resident involvement in tree-planting programs.
Keywords
Agricultural and Biological SciencesEnvironmental Science
Arboriculture & Urban ForestryAssessing the Benefits and Costs of the Urban Forest
559 Citations1992John F. Dwyer, E. Gregory McPherson +2 more
Landscape JournalSurveying Householder Response to Street Trees
62 Citations1990Robert Sommer, Hartmut Guenther +1 more
Environment and BehaviorUser Participation in Planning Environments
37 Citations1979Abraham Wandersman
