The 4P Classification of the Marketing Mix Revisited
Journal of MarketingPublished 1 October 1992
Walter van Waterschoot, Christophe Van den Bulte
Citations370
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score13.39
SNIP5.22
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
McCarthy's 4P classification of the marketing mix instruments has received wide acceptance in past decades. In recent years, however, increasing criticism has been voiced, among other reasons because of its inherent negative definition of sales promotion and its lack of mutual exclusiveness and collective exhaustiveness. The authors evaluate the 4P classification against the criteria proposed by Hunt and present an improved classification.
Keywords
Business, Management and Accounting
Journal of MarketingClassifying Products Strategically
315 Citations1986Patrick E. Murphy, Ben M. Enis
This article proposes an integrated product classification scheme that adds “preference” products to the conventional convenience, shopping, and specialty categories in terms of the effort and risk dimensions of price.
Wiley eBooksPromotion : a guide to effective promotional planning, strategies, and executions
16 Citations1984Dan Ailloni‐Charas
A comprehensive, step-by-step guide for effective promotion, written from a promotional person's point of view, covering the latest techniques and methods of selling, from pre-planning through follow-up.
International Journal of AdvertisingSales Promotions: Practice, Regulation and Self-Regulation Around the World
14 Citations1989Jean J. Boddewyn, Monica Leardi
