The psychology of tokenism: An analysis
Sex RolesPublished 1 March 1975
Judith Long Laws
Citations200
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.26
SNIP1.86
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
American society is analyzed as a gender-class system wherein tokenism is defined as a form of interclass mobility. Two role partners, Sponsor and Token, sustain the institution of tokenism: the Token is a member of the deviant class and the Sponsor is a member of the dominant class. The content and functioning of this role partnership are broadly defined. The limitations of tokenism and implications for change in the social system are discussed.
Keywords
PsychologySocial Sciences
Outsiders; studies in the sociology of deviance
4,731 Citations1963Howard S. Becker
Journal of Social IssuesDeterminants of Occupational Role Innovation Among College Women<sup>1</sup>
291 Citations1972Sandra S. Tangri
American Journal of SociologyEncountering the Male Establishment: Sex-Status Limits on Women's Careers in the Professions
159 Citations1970Cynthia Fuchs Epstein
The processes and structure of the professions in the United States which act to limit women's participation and achievement within them are identified.
Merrill-palmer QuarterlyRole Model Influences on College Women's Career Aspirations.
146 Citations1971Elizabeth M. Almquist, Shirley S. Angrist
