Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review
PLoS Computational BiologyPublished 18 July 2013Open access
Marco Pautasso
Citations359
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.50
SNIP1.14
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Ten simple rules, learned working on about 25 literature reviews as a PhD and postdoctoral student, about how to approach and carry out a literature review.
Keywords
Decision Sciences
Human Resource Development ReviewWriting Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
3,109 Citations2005Richard J. Torraco
Sage eBooksDoing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination.
1,378 Citations1998Chris Hart
Educational ResearcherScholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation
1,200 Citations2005David N. Boote, Penny Beile
PLoS MedicineSeventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
1,129 Citations2010Hilda Bastian, Paul Glasziou +1 more
Hilda Bastian and colleagues examine the extent to which critical summaries of clinical trials can be used by health professionals and the public.
Journal of InformetricsApproaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature
773 Citations2010Caroline S. Wagner, J. David Roessner +6 more
This literature review began with a narrow search for quantitative measures of the output of IDR that could contribute to indicators, but the authors expanded the scope of the review as it became clear that differing definitions, assessment tools, evaluation processes, and measures all shed light on different aspects ofIDR.
Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering
615 Citations2006David Budgen, Pearl Brereton
This tutorial is designed to provide an introduction to the role, form and processes involved in performing Systematic Literature Reviews, and to gain the knowledge needed to conduct systematic reviews of their own.
ScientometricsSleeping Beauties in science
565 Citations2004Anthony F. J. van Raan
The first extensive measurement of the occurrence of Sleeping Beauties in the science literature is reported, derived from the measurements an ‘awakening’ probability function and identified the ‘most extreme Sleeping Beauty so far’.
PubMedGuidelines for reading literature reviews.
495 Citations1988Andrew D Oxman, Gordon Guyatt
New guidelines that will help readers assess the scientific quality of the review are proposed and will allow clinicians to spend their valuable reading time on high-quality material and to judge the validity of an author's conclusions.
Methods in Ecology and EvolutionMethods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy
371 Citations2011William J. Sutherland, Erica Fleishman +3 more
In an effort to bridge the gap between conservation policy and science, multiple groups of policy makers, practitioners and researchers have convened to identify priority information needs that can be met by new research in the social and natural sciences.
European Journal of Plant PathologyImpacts of climate change on plant diseases—opinions and trends
352 Citations2012Marco Pautasso, Thomas Döring +3 more
This overview addresses the need for review of this burgeoning literature by summarizing opinions of previous reviews and trends in recent studies on the impacts of climate change on plant health, using Sudden Oak Death as an introductory case study.
The Literature Review : A Step-by-Step Guide for Students
209 Citations2012Diana Ridley
Medical EducationConducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach
189 Citations2012David A. Cook, Colin P. West
BioScienceCollaboration and Productivity in Scientific Synthesis
178 Citations2011Stephanie E. Hampton, John N. Parker
It is demonstrated with large-scale quantitative analyses that face-to-face interaction has been vital to success in synthesis groups, boosting the production of peer-reviewed publications and potentially increasing the capacity of the scientific community to leverage synthesis for enhanced scientific understanding.
Environmental Modelling & SoftwareTen guidelines for effective data visualization in scientific publications
176 Citations2011Christa Kelleher, Thorsten Wagener
Ten guidelines for effective data visualization in scientific publications are listed to support the primary objective of data visualization, i.e. to effectively convey information.
Nurse Education in PracticeStrategies for the construction of a critical review of the literature
143 Citations2001Ros Carnwell, William M. Daly
This paper describes the process by which a literature review is conducted, and explores how key words can be used to define the scope of the review, how the review can be organized into themes and how conclusions can be drawn from the literature to inform further studies.
Educational ResearchThe relationship of homework to A‐level results
136 Citations1992Peter Tymms, Carol Taylor Fitz‐Gibbon
ScientometricsWorsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases
135 Citations2010Marco Pautasso
The file-drawer problem is the tendency of journals to preferentially publish studies with statistically significant results that can lead to enhanced bias in meta-analysis and hence to a distorted picture of the evidence for or against a certain hypothesis.
Biological ConservationAre review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine
130 Citations2006P.D. Roberts, Gavin Stewart +1 more
Overall, ecological reviews show lower quality and greater variation in reporting style and review methods, and reviewers could use a systematic review approach and journals could provide more explicit guidelines for the preparation and production of review articles.
Laboratory InvestigationThe impact of review articles
115 Citations2007Catherine M. Ketcham, James M. Crawford
The fact that many review articles are poorly cited raises concern about the harm that poor review articles can cause, first by making it more difficult to find the good reviews, and in the worst case by propagating scientific error through lack of critical appraisal of original research.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationThe Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing
99 Citations2009Marcel Dijkers
It is argued here that reviews play a number of roles in scientific research and professional practice such as answering specific clinical questions, pooling data, comparing research, synthesizing complementary studies, offering guidance in uncharted fields, and “translating” research between disciplinary traditions.
Academic MedicineReproducibility of Literature Search Reporting in Medical Education Reviews
75 Citations2011Lauren A. Maggio, Nancy Hrinya Tannery +1 more
SustainabilityPublication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability
74 Citations2012Marco Pautasso
The evidence presented here casts a shadow on how sustainable the recent increase in scientific publications can be in the long term.
Perspectives on Psychological ScienceBite-Size Science and Its Undesired Side Effects
62 Citations2012Marco Bertamini, Marcus R. Munafò
It is argued that the most dangerous aspect of a shift toward “bite-size” publishing is the relationship between study size and publication bias.
PLoS Computational BiologyTen Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia
58 Citations2010Darren W. Logan, Massimo Sandal +3 more
Taking your first steps into Wikipedia can be daunting, but here the authors provide some tips that should make the editing process go smoothly.
Online Information ReviewAnalysis of the macro‐level discourse structure of literature reviews
57 Citations2011Christopher S. G. Khoo, Jin‐Cheon Na +1 more
It was found that literature reviews are written in two distinctive styles, with different discourse structures, found in information science journal papers.
Environmental Modelling & SoftwareWhat constitutes a good literature review and why does its quality matter?
49 Citations2013Holger R. Maier
What constitutes a good literature review and why does its quality matter Salinas formal argumentative essay example what to write in a book report sample of research proposal paper pdf.
OtolaryngologyHow to Systematically Review the Medical Literature
40 Citations1996Richard M. Rosenfeld
In contrast to traditional narrative reviews, systematic reviews are true hypothesis-driven research that captures the reader's attention through a skillful blend of numbers and narrative and qualifies for publication as original research in a peer-reviewed journal.
ScientometricsImpact of bibliometric studies on the publication behaviour of authors
25 Citations2013Carolin Michels, Ulrich Schmoch
It is concluded that authors adapt their publication behaviour to aim for journals that are more internationally known and have a US publisher, which raises the question whether the implicit penalization of specialized fields in the bibliometrics leads to undesired shifts in conducted research.
Medical HypothesesHow to surf today’s information tsunami: On the craft of effective reading
20 Citations2009Thomas C. Erren, Paul Cullen +1 more
Suggestions range from the appropriate motivation for reading articles in books, journals or on the internet to the very craft of systematically reviewing and, indeed, constantly challenging what one reads, which should be necessary conditions for everyone who works in science.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesScience as organized scepticism
18 Citations2011Robert M. May
Science is better seen as organized scepticism: a journey, over time, toward contingent understanding guided by experimental tests and sceptical questioning, which is beset by uncertainties of various kinds.