The Information Content of Value Line Convertible Bond Rankings
The Journal of Portfolio ManagementPublished 31 October 1997
Craig M. Lewis, Richard J. Rogalski, James K. Seward
Citations9
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.59
SNIP0.79
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The authors extend the research on the Value Line enigma to evaluate whether Value Line recommendations for convertible bonds provide excess returns, like Value Line’s recommendations do for common stocks and options. They find that, although convertible bond recommendations provide excess returns, the convertible bond rankings do not provide useful information beyond that contained in common stock recommendations of the same convertible bonds.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and FinanceBusiness, Management and Accounting
Journal of Financial EconomicsThe journal of financial economics
2,569 Citations1993G. William Schwert
Journal of Financial EconomicsCorporate mergers and security returns
365 Citations1986Debra Kay Dennis, John J. McConnell
Journal of Financial EconomicsWealth effects of going private for senior securities
194 Citations1989Laurentius Marais, Katherine Schipper +1 more
Journal of Financial EconomicsThe effect of value line investment survey rank changes on common stock prices
143 Citations1985Scott E. Stickel
Journal of Financial EconomicsThe relation between the Value Line enigma and post-earnings-announcement drift
91 Citations1992J. F. Affleck‐Graves, Richard R. Mendenhall
Journal of Financial and Quantitative AnalysisSecurity Price Reactions to Initial Reviews of Common Stock by the Value Line Investment Survey
40 Citations1987David R. Peterson
