Circular definitions, circular explanations, and infinite regresses
ArgumentationPublished 1 August 1994
Claude Gratton
Citations11
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.68
SNIP1.73
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This paper discusses some of the ways in which circular definitions and circular explanations entail or fail to entail infinite regresses. And since not all infinite regresses are vicious, a few criteria of viciousness are examined in order to determine when the entailment of a regress refutes a circular definition or a circular explanation.
Keywords
PsychologyArts and Humanities
The Concept of Mind
6,842 Citations2006Gilbert Ryle
Principles of Mathematics
504 Citations2009Bertrand Russell
NoûsQuestion-Begging and Cumulativeness in Dialectical Games
53 Citations1982John Woods, Douglas Walton
Commonplace Book: 1919-1953
37 Citations1962G. E. Moore, Casimir Lewy
Canadian Journal of PhilosophyThe Petitio: Aristotle's Five Ways
22 Citations1982John Woods, Douglas Walton
Notre Dame Journal of Formal LogicCircular demonstration and von Wright-Geach entailment.
5 Citations1979Douglas Walton, John Woods
It is suggested that the von Wright-Geach definiens, in effect, partially defines the concept of a non-circular demonstration, and it is argued that it can be extended in a natural way to yield a full definition for non- Circular demonstration.
Proceedings of the Aristotelian SocietyIII.—“Is There a Problem About Free Will?”
1 Citations1949D.J. O’Connor