Economic competition and political competition: An empirical note
Public ChoicePublished 1 January 1983
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
Citations64
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.85
SNIP1.36
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This paper has examined the proposition that more concentrated or consolidated metropolitan areas will produce public goods less efficiently than if there were a greater degree of interjurisdictional competition. The empirical evidence garnered in Section 3 suggests that interjurisdictional competition does tend to reduce the cost of providing local public services and, consequently, local government expenditure levels. Copyright Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1983
Keywords
Social SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
eScholarship (California Digital Library)Private Demands for Public Goods
957 Citations1973Ted Bergstrom, Robert P. Goodman
American Economic Reviewthe Demand for the Services of Non- Federal Governments
890 Citations2016Thomas E. Borcherding, Robert T. Deacon
Journal of Political EconomyThe Implications of Competition Among Jurisdictions: Does Tiebout Need Politics?
348 Citations1981Dennis Epple, Allan Zelenitz
