Deriving decision maker’s weights based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making
Expert Systems with ApplicationsPublished 16 March 2011
Zhongliang Yue
Citations145
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.85
SNIP2.55
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
A new approach for measuring the decision makers' weights in group decision making setting, in which the decision information, provided by multiple decision makers, is expressed in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers is developed.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to develop a new approach for measuring the decision makers' weights in group decision making setting, in which the decision information, provided by multiple decision makers, is expressed in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. There are two key issues being addressed in this approach. The first one is to develop an ideal decision of group, which is the mean of group decision. The second one is to select the similarity measure between each individual decision and the ideal decision according to the idea of the TOPSIS of Hwang and Yoon (1981). A numeric example is also given to clarify the developed approach and to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Keywords
Decision SciencesMathematics
Fuzzy Sets and SystemsIntuitionistic fuzzy sets
16,153 Citations1986Krassimir Atanassov
Various properties are proved, which are connected to the operations and relations over sets, and with modal and topological operators, defined over the set of IFS's.
Journal of the Operational Research SocietyDecisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
8,440 Citations1994Ralph L. Keeney, Howard Raiffa +1 more
Medical Entomology and ZoologyMultiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
8,268 Citations1981Shu-Jen J. Chen, C. L. Hwang +2 more
Fuzzy Sets and SystemsInterval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets
2,842 Citations1989Krassimir Atanassov, George Gargov
American Political Science ReviewA Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System
2,183 Citations1954L. S. Shapley, Martín Shubik
The method of measuring power, based on a technique of the mathematical theory of games, is presented here to a number of illustrative cases, including the United States Congress, and is intended as a first step in the attack on these problems.
Studies in fuzziness and soft computingInterval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
1,835 Citations2019Krassimir Atanassov
In this chapter, the basic definitions and properties of the interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs) will be introduced and the majority of the proofs below are analogous to the proofs from Chapter 1.
Decision Support SystemsGroup decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process
587 Citations1992Robert F. Dyer, Ernest H. Forman
Why AHP is so well-suited to group decision making is explained, how AHP can be applied in a variety of group decision contexts is shown, and four applications of AHP in group decisions are discussed.
European Journal of Operational ResearchGroup preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages
582 Citations1994Ramakrishnan Ramanathan, L.S. Ganesh
International Journal of Game TheoryA new index of power for simplen-person games
420 Citations1978John Deegan, Edward W. Packel
International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based SystemsAN OVERVIEW OF DISTANCE AND SIMILARITY MEASURES OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS
368 Citations2008Zeshui Xu, Jiayi Chen
This paper utilizes geometric distance model to define some continuous distance and similarity measures for IFSs, which are the various combinations and generalizations of the weighted Hamming distance, the weighted Euclidean distance and the weighted Hausdorff distance.
Applied Mathematical ModellingA method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS
351 Citations2010Zhongliang Yue
A new approach for determining weights of DMs in group decision environment based on an extended TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) method, which defines the positive ideal solution as the average of group decision.
Knowledge-Based SystemsAn extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers
336 Citations2010Zhongliang Yue
A method for determining weights of decision makers under group decision environment, in which the each individual decision information is expressed by a matrix in interval numbers, and the relative closeness to the ideal solution is defined based on Euclidean distance.
Management ScienceGroup Decision Making Using Cardinal Social Welfare Functions
238 Citations1975Ralph L. Keeney, Craig W. Kirkwood
Management ScienceA Group Preference Axiomatization with Cardinal Utility
221 Citations1976Ralph L. Keeney
Group Decision and NegotiationA Deviation-Based Approach to Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making
176 Citations2009Zeshui Xu
An optimization model is developed by which a straightforward formula for deriving attribute weights can be obtained and an approach to ranking the given alternatives and then selecting the most desirable one(s) is given.
Management ScienceNote—A Delegation Process for Combining Individual Utility Functions
111 Citations1979Samuel E. Bodily
Group Decision and NegotiationA Distance-Based Collective Preorder Integrating the Relative Importance of the Group's Members
72 Citations2004Khaled Jabeur, Jean‐Marc Martel +1 more
This paper built a distance measure between pairs of binary relations in order to quantify the divergence between two preorders and determined the relative importance coefficients of the group's members by using a method based on subjective and objective components.
Group Decision and NegotiationDecisional Power in Group Decision Making: A Note on the Allocation of Group Members' Weights in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART
68 Citations2001R. C. Van Den Honert
The REMBRANDT suite of decision models (multiplicative AHP and SMART) are adapted to measure decisional power in groups, and this is generalised to cater for the case where power itself is deemed to be multidimensional in nature, and the case of uncertain subjective judgements of power amongst group members.
Expert Systems with ApplicationsAn approach to aggregating interval numbers into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information for group decision making
68 Citations2010Zhongliang Yue
This paper develops an approach for aggregating attribute satisfactory interval and attribute dissatisfactory interval into the collective attribute interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy number (IVIFN), and obtains the collective interval- values in the group decision matrices provided by each decision maker (DM) characterized by interval numbers.
International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based SystemsAN APPROACH FOR MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING BASED ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY INFORMATION
50 Citations2009Zhongliang Yue, Yuying Jia +1 more
The concepts of supporting, opposing and neutral set of alternative respectively are defined, an approach for transform attribute values into intuitionistic fuzzy number is developed, and the order of alternatives is determined based on the score and the degree of accuracy of the intuitionism fuzzy number.
Management ScienceOn the Symmetry Approach to the Committee Decision Problem
40 Citations1963Henri Theil
Group Decision and NegotiationA Distance-Based Collective Weak Ordering
29 Citations2001Slim Ben Khélifa, Jean‐Marc Martel
An axiomatic structure relating to the concept of distance between binary relations is developed and an algorithm for deriving the collective weak ordering is proposed, based on the idea of ranking first the least dominated alternatives.
INFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchQuantification De L’importance Relative Des Membres D’un Groupe En Vue De Déterminer Un Préordre Collectif
16 Citations2002Khaled Jabeur, Jean‐Marc Martel
This work proposes a method to quantify, for each pair of actions, the relative importance of the members, based first on revised Simos and DeGroot methods and second on the exploitation of individual preference structures.