login

AMALGAM: automatic mapping among lexicogrammatical annotation models

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)Published 1 January 1994Open access
Eric Atwell, John Hughes, DC Souter
Citations20
View PDF

TL;DR

The development of the mapping algorithms aims to distinguish notational from substantive differences in the annotation schemes, and will be able to evaluate tagging schemes in terms of how well they fit standard statistical language models such as n-pos (Markov) models.

Abstract

Several Corpus Linguistics research groups have gone beyond collation of 'raw' text, to syntactic annotation of the text. However, linguists developing these linguistic resources have used quite different wordtagging and parse-tree labelling schemes in each of these annotated corpora. This restricts the accessibility of each corpus, making it impossible for speech and handwriting researchers to collate them into a single very large training set. This is particularly problematic as there is evidence that one of these parsed corpora on its own is too small for a general statistical model of grammat- ical structure, but the combined size of all the above annotated corpora should deliver a much more reliable model. We are developing a set of mapping algorithms to map between the main tagsets and phrase structure grammar schemes used in the above corpora. We plan to develop a Multi-tagged Corpus and a MultiTreebank, a single text-set annotated with all the above tagging and parsing schemes. The text-set is the Spoken English Corpus: this is a half-way house between formal written text and colloquial conversational speech. tlowever, the main deliverable to the computational linguis- tics research community is not the SEC-based MultiTreebank, but the mapping suite used to produce it - this can be used to combine currently-incompatible syntactic training sets into a large unified multicorpus. Our architecture combines standard statistical language modelling and a rule-base derived from linguists' analyses of tagset-mappings, in a novel yet intuitive way. Our development of the mapping algorithms aims to distinguish notational from substantive differences in the annotation schemes, and we will be able to evaluate tagging schemes in terms of how well they fit standard statistical...

Keywords

Computer Science