Item Format and the Structure of the Personal Orientation Inventory
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Two versions of the Personal Orientation Inventory were administered to 317 subjects. One version em ployed the standard two-choice response format. The other version used a six-choice response format. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine if a multi ple-response format resulted in improved psychometric properties, (2) to compare the component structure of the two versions, and (3) to compare the empirically derived scales with the theoretically defined scales. The results showed a slight improvement for the mul tiple-response format, but with poorly defined compo nent patterns. The change in format resulted in a change in component structure. The components de rived from both versions did not correspond to the theoretical scales. An analysis indicated that the only well-defined component from either response format could be interpreted as measuring social desirability responding rather than measuring content. A follow-up questionnaire indicated greater subject acceptance of the six-choice version.
