Conceptual Implications of Two Models of Burnout
Group & Organization StudiesPublished 1 March 1989
Michael P. Leiter
Citations91
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This article focuses on differences between the model of burnout developed by Leiter and the phase model of Golembiewski. The advantages of utilizing the full range of the subscales are contrasted with the phase approach based on dichotomizing the subscales. Directions for future model building are discussed.
Keywords
PsychologyBusiness, Management and Accounting
Maslach burnout inventory manual
7,600 Citations1996Christina Maslach, Sue Jackson +1 more
Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction
3,784 Citations1982Elazar J. Pedhazur
Journal of Organizational BehaviorThe impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment
1,586 Citations1988Michael P. Leiter, Christina Maslach
Journal of Applied PsychologyToward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon.
895 Citations1986Sue Jackson, Richard L. Schwab +1 more
Les auteurs decrivent les antecedents et les consequences du phenomene de «burnout» apparaissant dans certaines professions and constitue des trois composantes d'epuisement emotionnel de depersonnallisation and de sentiments d'echec personnel.
Group & Organization StudiesBurnout as a Function of Communication Patterns
127 Citations1988Michael P. Leiter
Canadian Journal of Community Mental HealthCommitment As A Function of Stress Reactions Among Nurses: A Model of Psychological Evaluations of Work Settings
50 Citations1988Michael P. Leiter
Regression analyses established that both stressors and supports from social and nonsocial aspects of organizations are independently associated with the way workers evaluate their work settings.