The spacing effect in 4- to 9-year-old children
Memory & CognitionPublished 1 September 1987Open access
Cornelius P. Rea, Vito Modigliani
Citations54
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.15
SNIP1.32
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The results of both experiments suggest that the spacing effect does not emerge with development.
Abstract
Experiment 1 of the current research failed to replicate Toppino and Di George's (1984) finding that older children but not preschoolers showed a spacing effect. Instead, we obtained the spacing effect in all the age groups tested (preschool, kindergarten, first-grade, and third-grade children). The effect was demonstrated with two types of material, words and pictures. Experiment 2 focused on the role that very brief spacings, with no intervening items between repetitions, play in later retention. Age groups and materials were the same as in Experiment 1. Four different levels of spacing were included (0-, 1.1-,2.5-, and 5-sec intervals). The spacing effect was again obtained for all age groups with both words and pictures. The results of both experiments suggest that the spacing effect does not emerge with development.
Keywords
PsychologyMathematicsEngineering
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorLevels of processing: A framework for memory research
9,538 Citations1972Fergus I. M. Craik, Robert S. Lockhart
An alternative framework for human memory research is outlined in terms of depth or levels of processing and some current data and arguments are reexamined in the light of this alternative framework.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & MemoryA standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.
5,061 Citations1980Joan Gay Snodgrass, Mary Vanderwart
A standardized set of 260 pictures, selected to provide exemplars from several widely studied semantic categories, are presented for use in experiments investigating differences and similarities in the processing of pictures and words.
The American Journal of PsychologyPrinciples of Learning and Memory
1,337 Citations1977Bennet B. Murdock, Robert G. Crowder
Psychology of Memory
700 Citations1976Alan Baddeley, Baddeley
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorOn interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution
668 Citations1978Larry L. Jacoby
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorThe situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory
522 Citations1970Arthur W. Melton
Memory & CognitionComponent-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition
448 Citations1979Arthur M. Glenberg
A theory of spacing effects is described that uses the same principles to account for both facilitatory and inhibitory effects of spacing in a number of memory paradigms.
The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivationRepetition and Memory
373 Citations1976Douglas L. Hintzman
Theoretical Implications of the Spacing Effect 1
369 Citations2024Douglas L. Hintzman
The Journal of Educational ResearchEffects of Massed and Distributed Practice on the Learning and Retention of Second-Language Vocabulary
242 Citations1981Kristine C. Bloom, Thomas J. Shuell
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorLearning from tests: Effects of spacing
139 Citations1977William B. Whitten, Robert A. Bjork
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorSome correlates of item repetition in free-recall learning
116 Citations1969Benton J. Underwood
Memory & CognitionSome effects of remembering on forgetting
114 Citations1983Willard N. Runquist
It was concluded that the critical aspects of a test are the retrieval operations themselves, and suggestions are made as to how these operations attenuate forgetting.
Child DevelopmentLABELING EFFECTS IN SHORT-TERM MEMORY
110 Citations1968John W. Hagen, Phillip R. Kingsley
It was found that overt labeling facilitatedSTM performance for Ss in the intermediate age range but not for the youngest and oldest Ss, and an age-related improvement in STM performance was also found.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorA breakdown of the total-time law in free-recall learning
104 Citations1970Benton J. Underwood
Child DevelopmentTHE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN PERCEIVING AND MEMORIZING
85 Citations1972LYNNE F. AAPEL, Robert G. Cooper +4 more
Evidence from both experiments largely confirmed the predictions, derived from this "differentiation hypothesis," that young children would study no differently and subsequently recall no better when instructed to memorize items for future recall than when instructed merely to look at them.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & MemoryEncoding and use of detail information in picture recognition.
77 Citations1979Geoffrey R. Loftus, Howard J. Kallman
ST subjects showed superior recognition memory performance relative to T subjects and an encoded detail provided a better discriminative feature for ST subjects, providing strong support for a model which assumed there is a constant probability of encoding a detail during each successive unit of time at study.
Memory & CognitionSpacing effects in picture memory
67 Citations1973Douglas L. Hintzman, Miriam K. Rogers
Three experiments were conducted in testing the hypothesis that the effect of spacing on memory is due to rehearsal, and it was concluded that the spacing effect is primarily a function of the duration of the spacing interval.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorEncoding variability and retention
63 Citations1983Leo Postman, K. Knecht
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorMemory for at least one of two items: Test and failure of several theories of spacing effects
52 Citations1978Brian H. Ross, Thomas K. Landauer
Memory & CognitionWhat causes the spacing effect? Some effects of repetition, duration, and spacing on memory for pictures
51 Citations1975Douglas L. Hintzman, Jeffery J. Summers +1 more
Some evidence from Experiments I and III suggests that an interrupted stimulus is recognized better than one that is not interrupted—a finding that, if replicable, would support the habituation-recovery account of the spacing effect.
Memory & CognitionDistributed study facilitates infants’ delayed recognition memory
48 Citations1980Edward H. Cornell
The results suggest that the distribution effect reflects a fundamental and automatic process of human memory, which is beneficial on retention due to the temporal spacing of study.
Memory & CognitionThe within-list distributed practice effect: Tests of the varied context and varied encoding hypotheses
44 Citations1976Ann Stash Maskarinec, Charles P. Thompson
While the prediction that the recall of MP-DP items should be comparable under comparable levels of encoding was not supported, differences were obtained in recall of items under same and variable orienting task conditions.
Memory & CognitionEncoding variability, levels of processing, and the effects of spacing of repetitions upon judgments of frequency
39 Citations1980Robert J. Rose
Memory & CognitionThe spacing effect in free recall emerges with development
37 Citations1984Thomas C. Toppino, William DiGeorge
This finding that the spacing effect in free recall emerges with development suggests that the phenomenon cannot be explained solely in terms of a primitive encoding mechanism that is hard-wired into the memory system.
Memory & CognitionPupil dilations following pairs of identical and related to-be-remembered words
36 Citations1983Anthony Magliero
Two experiments are reported in which the spacing between pairs of identical or pairs of related to-be-remembered words were varied while pupil diameter and frequency judgments were measured, interpreted as supporting theories that argue that massed repetitions require less processing than spaced repetitions.
The American Journal of PsychologyLong-Term Retention and the Spacing Effect in Free-Recall and Frequency Judgments
30 Citations1977John J. Shaughnessy
PubMedNonverbal mnemonic mediation in preschool children.
30 Citations1970Sarah Ryan, Ada G. Hegion +1 more
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorSemantic-feature variability and the spacing effect
28 Citations1979Carl E. McFarland, Deborah D. Rhodes +1 more
Journal of Mathematical PsychologyRecognition learning as a function of the length of the retention interval and changes in the retention interval
28 Citations1966Walter Kintsch
The theoretical objectives were to separate the roles of forgetting and learning, and to determine whether the learning process may be viewed as a simple conditioning process or whether the subject employs different recognition criteria after varying retention intervals.
Child DevelopmentThe Primacy Effect in Young Children: Verbal Fact or Spatial Artifact?
26 Citations1976Alexander W. Siegel, Judith P. Allik +1 more
Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyEffects of spacing repetitions on children's memory
25 Citations1984Thomas C. Toppino, Marla DeMesquita
Memory & CognitionEffects of orienting task, spacing of repetitions, and list context on judgments of frequency
24 Citations1977Edward J. Rowe, Robert J. Rose
Postlist frequency judgments of words presented three and five times were higher for the list containing words of Frequency 7, and judgments were also higher following the imagery rating task and relevant to theoretical interpretations of the spacing effect.
Memory & CognitionThe spacing effect in the learning of word pairs
24 Citations1974John J. Shaughnessy, Joel Zimmerman +1 more
Recall of MP same pairs and the eomponents of these pairs was consistently poorer than that of DP same pairs, and Recall of the repeated component of the different pairs was also poorer under MP than under DP.
The American Journal of PsychologyResistance of the Spacing Effect to Variations in Encoding
23 Citations1978Charles Bird, Angus J. Nicholson +1 more
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorConsolidation in human memory: Retrograde amnestic effects of confusable items in paired-associate learning
21 Citations1974Thomas K. Landauer
Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and CognitionThe lag effect and differential organization theory: Nine failures to replicate.
21 Citations1985Thomas C. Toppino, Thomas F. Gracen
These results suggest that there are boundary conditions limiting the generality of the monotonically increasing lag effect in free recall and that caution should be exercised in accepting certain previous findings as strong evidence for a differential organization explanation of the phenomenon.
Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de PsychologieProcessing time for repetitions and the spacing effect.
21 Citations1984Robert J. Rose
Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyDevelopmental changes in the lag effect: An encoding hypothesis for repeated word recall
17 Citations1976William P. Wilson
Memory & CognitionThe effect of constant vs. varied encoding and massed vs. distributed presentations on recall of paired associates
11 Citations1975Marian Schwartz
The results (a) support none of the current proposed explanations for the distributed practice effect, and suggest that the critical factor in determining the probability of response recall is the strength of the strongest potential route to the response, not the number of different routes.
Bulletin of the Psychonomic SocietyCan simple instructions to use spaced practice improve ability to remember a fact?: An experimental test using telephone numbers
11 Citations1977Thomas K. Landauer, Brian H. Ross
Bulletin of the Psychonomic SocietyRepetition between and within modalities in free recall
9 Citations1974J. Elisabeth Wells, Kim Kirsner