Phenomena of Retraction
JAMAPublished 15 July 1998
John M. Budd, MaryEllen Sievert, Tom R. Schultz
Citations229
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score5.35
SNIP10.71
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Retracted articles continue to be cited as valid work in the biomedical literature after publication of the retraction; these citations signal potential problems for biomedical science.
Abstract
Retracted articles continue to be cited as valid work in the biomedical literature after publication of the retraction; these citations signal potential problems for biomedical science.
Keywords
Social Sciences
NatureThe integrity of the scientific literature
162 Citations1987Walter W. Stewart, Ned Feder
A case of admitted scientific fraud has shed new light on the system that ensures the integrity of the scientific literature and some lapses from generally accepted standards of research may be more frequent than is commonly believed.
Journal of the American Society for Information ScienceThe persistence of fraud in the literature: The Darsee case
76 Citations1992Carol Kochan, John M. Budd
The present study shows that, although a considerable amount of time has passed and some of his papers have been retracted, Darsee's work continues to be cited, and cited positively, in the literature on cardiology through 1990.
JAMAThe Scientific Community's Response to Evidence of Fraudulent Publication
46 Citations1994William P. Whitely
In the Slutsky case, general news articles and the three reviews published by the University of California-San Diego were most effective and retractions were least effective in purging fraudulent results from the literature.