login

A manifesto for reproducible science

Nature Human BehaviourPublished 10 January 2017Open access
Marcus R. Munafò, Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy Bishop, Katherine S. Button, Chris Chambers, Nathalie Percie du Sert
Citations3,499
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score5.54
SNIP5.30
View PDF

TL;DR

This work argues for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: methods, reporting and dissemination, reproducibility, evaluation and incentives, in the hope that this will facilitate action toward improving the transparency, reproducible and efficiency of scientific research.

Abstract

Improving the reliability and efficiency of scientific research will increase the credibility of the published scientific literature and accelerate discovery. Here we argue for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: methods, reporting and dissemination, reproducibility, evaluation and incentives. There is some evidence from both simulations and empirical studies supporting the likely effectiveness of these measures, but their broad adoption by researchers, institutions, funders and journals will require iterative evaluation and improvement. We discuss the goals of these measures, and how they can be implemented, in the hope that this will facilitate action toward improving the transparency, reproducibility and efficiency of scientific research.

Keywords

Decision Sciences