login

Numeric Judgments under Uncertainty: The Role of Knowledge in Anchoring

Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyPublished 1 September 2000
Thomas Mussweiler, Fritz Strack
Citations232
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.06
SNIP1.68

TL;DR

An apparatus which is capable of being used in the field is adapted to polish fiber end faces each terminated by a plurality of cylindrically shaped ferrule type connector plugs, causing relative motion between the plurality of plugs and the polishing surface to exist.

Abstract

Three studies demonstrate that anchoring effects—the assimilation of a numeric estimate to a previously considered standard—depend on judges' knowledge about the target object. Manipulating judges' knowledge by varying the context in which a fictitious target is presented, Study 1 demonstrates that anchor plausibility determines how a given anchor is processed and depends on what knowledge base is used to judge the anchor. Studies 2 and 3 show that the less judges know about the target object, the more they assimilate their estimate to the anchor. These differences in the magnitude of the anchoring effect appear to be mediated by differences in the perceived plausibility of the anchors. Furthermore, Study 3 demonstrates that these effects even hold when the selection of the anchor values is under participants' control.

Keywords

Social SciencesDecision Sciences