Comparing the Bayes and Typicalness Frameworks

This paper outlines the typicalness framework, which provides confidence information based only on the standard iid assumption and so is much more robust to different underlying data distributions, and shows how the framework can be applied to existing algorithms.

Abstract

When correct priors are known, Bayesian algorithms give optimal decisions, and accurate confidence values for predictions can be obtained. If the prior is incorrect however, these confidence values have no theoretical base — even though the algorithms' predictive performance may be good. There also exist many successful learning algorithms which only depend on the iid assumption. Often however they produce no confidence values for their predictions. Bayesian frameworks are often applied to these algorithms in order to obtain such values, however they can rely on unjustified priors. In this paper we outline the typicalness framework which can be used in conjunction with many other machine learning algorithms. The framework provides confidence information based only on the standard iid assumption and so is much more robust to different underlying data distributions. We show how the framework can be applied to existing algorithms. We also present experimental results which show that the typicalness approach performs close to Bayes when the prior is known to be correct. Unlike Bayes however, the method still gives accurate confidence values even when different data distributions are considered.