Confronting Perpetrators of Prejudice: The Inhibitory Effects of Social Costs
Psychology of Women QuarterlyPublished 12 August 2004
Shelton J. Nicole, Rebecca E. Stewart
Citations218
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.14
SNIP1.61
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to investigate the extent to which social costs influence whether or not targets of prejudice confront individuals who behave in a prejudiced manner during interpersonal interactions. Consistent with our predictions, we found that although women believe they will confront perpetrators of prejudice regardless of the social costs, in reality, they are less likely to confront male perpetrators in high social cost situations. Implications for how targets cope with prejudice and discrimination are discussed.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyGender, language, and influence.
607 Citations1990Linda L. Carli
Personality and Social Psychology BulletinStop Complaining! The Social Costs of Making Attributions to Discrimination
522 Citations2001Cheryl R. Kaiser, Carol T. Miller
Personality and Social Psychology BulletinConfronting Prejudice (Literally): Reactions to Confrontations of Racial and Gender Bias
474 Citations2003Alexander M. Czopp, Margo J. Monteith
Psychological BulletinComplaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences.
410 Citations1996Robin M. Kowalski
Examination of variables related to people's dissatisfaction and complaining thresholds, functions of complaining, and intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of complaining are examined.
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyExcuse Me—What Did You Just Say?!: Women's Public and Private Responses to Sexist Remarks
388 Citations1999Janet K. Swim, Lauri L. Hyers
Journal of Social IssuesReal Versus Imagined Gender Harassment
381 Citations2001Julie A. Woodzicka, Marianne LaFrance
Journal of Social IssuesWhy Didn't She Just Report Him? The Psychological and Legal Implications of Women's Responses to Sexual Harassment
359 Citations1995Louise F. Fitzgerald, Suzanne C. Swan +1 more
Personality and Social Psychology BulletinSimulation, Scenarios, and Emotional Appraisal: Testing the Convergence of Real and Imagined Reactions to Emotional Stimuli
308 Citations2001Michael D. Robinson, Gerald L. Clore
Group Processes & Intergroup RelationsDerogating the Victim: The Interpersonal Consequences of Blaming Events on Discrimination
157 Citations2003Cheryl R. Kaiser, Carol T. Miller
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyReporting discrimination in public and private contexts.
149 Citations2002Charles Stangor, Janet K. Swim +2 more
Women and African Americans were more likely to report that a failing grade assigned by a man or a European American was caused by discrimination, rather than by their own lack of ability, when they made the judgment privately and in the presence of a fellow stigmatized group member.
