login

The paradox of the parts and the whole in understanding and improving general practice

International Journal for Quality in Health CarePublished 1 August 2002Open access
Kurt C. Stange
Citations78
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.85
SNIP1.11
View PDF

TL;DR

The book reviewed in this issue of the Journal epitomizes the state of the art of quality measurement in general practice and provides a guide to developing indicators of the quality of general practice.

Abstract

The book reviewed in this issue of the Journal [1] epitomizes the state of the art of quality measurement in general practice. Currently available quality indicators are based on a mix of scientific evidence and expert opinion. Indicators assess processes of care that have been found to be associated with markers of patient outcomes. Quality of care measures and clinical indicators are typically criticized for the limitations of the scientific evidence on which they are based and for their strong reliance on what can be measured [2–4]. However, an even more fundamental issue is important to developing indicators of the quality of general practice. This larger issue is the problem of the parts and the whole—that is, indicators of the quality of care for specific diseases may not adequately represent the quality of care for the whole …

Keywords

Health ProfessionsEconomics, Econometrics and Finance