Top-Management Agreement and Organizational Performance
Human RelationsPublished 1 December 1982
Lawrence G. Hrebiniak, Charles C. Snow
Citations104
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score4.15
SNIP3.35
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This paper relates top-management agreement on an organization's strengths and weaknesses with organizational performance. The findings are interesting and provocative, for the data show that agreement among managers is positively related to economic performance, even when controlling for other variables potentially related to organizational performance. The importance of top management agreement and its impact on organization performance are discussed.
Keywords
Business, Management and Accounting
Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977)The Nature of Managerial Work
6,346 Citations1974B. E. Partridge, Henry Mintzberg
Public Productivity ReviewThe Concept of Corporate Strategy
4,150 Citations1987Tom Iverson, Kenneth R. Andrews
American Sociological ReviewA Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
2,507 Citations1967Charles Perrow
Administrative Science QuarterlyStrategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance
1,362 Citations1980Charles C. Snow, Lawrence G. Hrebiniak
Administrative Science QuarterlyEnvironment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy
964 Citations1958William R. Dill
Management ScienceReactions to Intergroup Competition Under Win-Lose Conditions
94 Citations1961Robert R. Blake, Jane Srygley Mouton
