Peer Review Is an Effective Screening Process to Evaluate Medical Manuscripts
JAMAPublished 13 July 1994
Margaret Abby
Citations52
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score5.35
SNIP10.71
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The data indicate that the review process serves as a sieve and influences whether manuscripts are published in core medical journals, as demonstrated by the fact that rejected manuscripts often were not published in other indexed medical journals.
Abstract
Our data indicate that the review process serves as a sieve and influences whether manuscripts are published in core medical journals. This was demonstrated by the fact that rejected manuscripts often were not published in other indexed medical journals.
Keywords
Decision SciencesArts and HumanitiesPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
ScienceCommunication in the Physical and the Social Sciences
141 Citations1970William D. Garvey, Nan Lin +1 more
Because the lags and filtering within each system differ in loci and extent, the members of different disciplines adjust to them differently, and the overall information flow patterns in the physical and in the social sciences differ.
Journal of Clinical InvestigationPeer review and publication. Presidential address before the 70th annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, San Francisco, California, 30 April 1978.
105 Citations1978Jess Wilson
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésiePublication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings
96 Citations1993S. M. Yentis, Fiona Campbell +1 more
Although the overall proportion of abstracts that was published within five years of presentation did not differ from the rate of publication within three years, it is recommended that a uniform policy with respect to the time interval for citation of Abstracts be adopted for all anaesthesia journals.
American Journal of RoentgenologyFate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.
62 Citations1991Felix S. Chew
The results of this study indicate that rejection of a manuscript by a peer-reviewed journal such as AJR delays but by no means precludes publication.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the PacificWhat Happens to Rejected Astronomical Papers?
50 Citations1988Helmut A. Abt
PubMedThe pattern of publishing previously rejected articles in selected journals.
12 Citations1987N Whitman, S Eyre
Survey of authors in nine journals read by family medicine teachers found that the New England Journal of Medicine had the highest "not previously rejected" rate and the Journal of the American Medical Association had the lowest rate.
