Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation
Higher EducationPublished 12 June 2008
Diana Hicks
Citations93
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.15
SNIP3.37
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Since 1980, national university departmental ranking exercises have developed in several countries. This paper reviews exercises in the U.S., U.K. and Australia to assess the state-of-the-art and to identify common themes and trends. The findings are that the exercises are becoming more elaborate, even unwieldy, and that there is some retreat from complexity. There seems to be a movement towards bibliometric measures. The exercises also seem to be effective in enhancing university focus on research strategy.
Keywords
Social SciencesDecision Sciences
MinervaUniversity Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison
637 Citations2003Aldo Geuna, Ben R. Martin
Research PolicyExplaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts
441 Citations2002Linda Butler
The Journal of Economic PerspectivesRankings of U.S. Economics Departments
265 Citations1998Richard Dusansky, Clayton J Vernon
ScientometricsUK Research Assessment Exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity?
181 Citations2007Henk F. Moed
A longitudinal analysis of UK science covering almost 20 years revealed in the years prior to a Research Assessment Exercise (RAE 1992, 1996 and 2001) three distinct bibliometric patterns, that can be interpreted in terms of scientists’ responses to the principal evaluation criteria applied in a RAE.
Higher EducationSteering from a distance: Power relations in Australian higher education
128 Citations1997Simon Marginson
National Academies Press (US) eBooksAssessing Research-Doctorate Programs: A Methodology Study
53 Citations2003Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Charlotte V Kuh +1 more
This study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph.D.s in the United States.
Journal of Higher Education Policy and ManagementAllocating Research Infrastructure Grants in Post-binary Higher Education Systems: British and Australian approaches
37 Citations2000Grant Harman
PS Political Science & PoliticsDepartment Rankings: An Alternative Approach
35 Citations1996Arthur H. Miller, Charles Tien +1 more
PS Political Science & PoliticsRating the Rating: An Analysis of the National Research Council's Appraisal of Political Science Ph.D. Programs
32 Citations1996Robert W. Jackman, Randolph M. Siverson
Research EvaluationIntraorganisational evaluation: are there ‘least evaluable units’?
16 Citations2004Jochen Gläser, Thomas H. Spurling +1 more
