Skeletal growth, fatness and menarcheal age: a comparison of two hypotheses.
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Support is found in "data on the age at which appropriate height and pelvic size for reproduction are attained" that the physical and mechanical constraints of reproduction are considered to have effected this synchronization through the agency of natural selection.
Abstract
Two hypotheses relating menarcheal age to physical growth are compared. One suggests that menarcheal age is closely coordinated with skeletal development the other that it is contingent upon accumulation of sufficient fat. A factor analysis of longitudinal growth is used to achieve a heuristic separation of weight and height variables. Subsequent regression of menarcheal age on orthogonal factors yields support for both views but indicates that skeletal maturation exerts a much stronger influence accounting for three times as much menarcheal age variance as weight or relative weight. Further support for this synchronization is found in data on the age at which appropriate height and pelvic size for reproduction are attained. The physical and mechanical constraints of reproduction are considered to have effected this synchronization through the agency of natural selection. (EXCERPT)