Self-deception and self-discovery in fieldwork
Qualitative SociologyPublished 1 January 1983
Arlene Kaplan Daniels
Citations58
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.97
SNIP1.82
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This paper shows how fieldwork experiences create a situation in which the researcher and the native reveal their characters in the course of requesting and offering information about the study. The personalities of the fieldworker and the natives help to color and may even define the nature of the interaction. It would be a mistake to ignore the effect of character on the content of studies. Researchers learn about their own strengths and weaknesses as fieldworkers by examining that effect.
Keywords
Social Sciences
American Sociological ReviewSociological Work: Method and Substance.
636 Citations1971Irving Louis Horowitz, Howard S. Becker
Tally's corner
456 Citations1967Célia Bense Ferreira Alves, Liebow Elliot
Social ForcesDoing Fieldwork: Warnings and Advice.
345 Citations1972William Foote Whyte, Rosalie H. Wax
Symbolic InteractionPolitical Activist As Participant Observer: Conflicts Of Commitment In A Study Of The Draft Resistance Movement Of The 1960's*
64 Citations1979Barrie Thome
Theory and SocietySurvival in the field: Implications of personal experience in field work
45 Citations1975Mike Clarke
Social ProblemsEditorial Introduction: Toward a Moral Science of Human Beings
36 Citations1980Joan Cassell, Murray L. Wax
