Learning to Succeed: What European Firms Can Learn from Japanese Approaches to Strategic Alliances
Creativity and Innovation ManagementPublished 1 June 1993
Yoshiya Teramoto, Frank‐Jürgen Richter, Naoto Iwasaki
Citations16
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.16
SNIP1.57
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Japanese companies seem able to gain knowledge from their partners in more efficient ways than their European counterparts. Case examples are given in which the European firm, or the Japanese firm begins in the dominant knowhow position. Other examples of strategic alliances between Japanese small businesses are also cited. A learning model is advanced which illustrates the evolution of power through intra‐ and inter‐firm learning processes. An organizational capacity to enhance systemic learning seems to be the key to successful evolution of the firm.
Keywords
Business, Management and Accounting
American Sociological ReviewThe Theory of Social and Economic Organization.
11,451 Citations1948Gottfried Salomon Delatour, Max Weber +2 more
Strategic Management JournalCompetition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances
4,281 Citations1991Gary Hamel
Strategic Management JournalA transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures
1,832 Citations1988Jean‐François Hennart
Human Resource ManagementStrategic alliances, organizational learning, and competitive advantage: The HRM agenda
295 Citations1988Vladimir Pucik
International Journal of Technology ManagementNetwork organization for inter–firm R&D activities: experiences of Japanese small businesses
5 Citations2014Koichi Furukawa, Yoshiya Teramoto +1 more
