Intervals for Posttest Probabilities: A Comparison of 5 Methods
Medical Decision MakingPublished 1 December 2001
Douglas Mossman, James O. Berger
Citations31
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.48
SNIP1.35
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
This work describes 5 methods of constructing confidence intervals for posttest probabilities when estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and the pretest probability of a disorder are derived from empirical data, and concludes that an objective Bayesian approach is the best approach.
Abstract
Physicians and investigators can generate accurate confidence intervals for posttest probabilities in small-sample situations using the objective Bayesian approach.
Keywords
MathematicsDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
