Occam's two razors: the sharp and the blunt
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The balance is strongly against Occam's razor, and a version of the first razor more appropriate to KDD is proposed, and it is argued that continuing to apply the second razor risks causing significant opportunities to be missed.
Abstract
Occam's razor has been the subject of much controversy. This paper argues that this is partly because it has been interpreted in two quite different ways, the first of which (simplicity is a goal in itself) is essentially correct, while the (simplicity leads to greater accuracy) is not. The paper reviews the large variety of theoretical arguments and empirical evidence for and against the second razor, and concludes that the balance is strongly against it. In particular, it builds on the case of (Schaffer, 1993) and (Webb, 1996) by considering additional theoretical arguments and recent empirical evidence that the razor fails in most domains. A version of the first razor more appropriate to KDD is proposed, and we argue that continuing to apply the razor risks causing significant opportunities to be missed.
