Responsiveness and everyday life
New Directions for EvaluationPublished 1 December 2001
Thomas A. Schwandt
Citations26
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.48
SNIP0.66
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract Responsiveness is not merely a characteristic of a special methodology for evaluation. It is also an epistemic and moral virtue that signals a particular relation to the social world and a distinctive way of being and knowing within that world.
Keywords
Social SciencesArts and Humanities
Abuse of Casuistry
986 Citations1988Jonsen/Toulmin
Teachers College Press eBooksNarrative in teaching, learning, and research
364 Citations1995Hunter McEwan, Kieran Egan
Kennedy Institute of Ethics journalThe Beleaguered Rulers: The Public Obligation of the Professional
112 Citations1992William F. May
Modern professionals wield considerable power by virtue of their knowledge, but they also feel beleaguered by the constraints they face and the public disapproval they often experience.
Casuistry and Modern Ethics: A Poetics of Practical Reasoning
63 Citations1996Richard B. Miller
Evaluation PracticeThe evolving syntheses of program value
40 Citations1997Robert E. Stake, Christopher Migotsky +10 more
New Directions for EvaluationThe landscape of values in evaluation: Charted terrain and unexplored territory
33 Citations1997Thomas A. Schwandt
New Directions for EvaluationA modest commitment to the promotion of democracy
26 Citations2000Robert E. Stake