login

Medical Intensive Care: Indications, Interventions, and Outcomes

New England Journal of MedicinePublished 24 April 1980
George E. Thibault, Albert G. Mulley, G. Octo Barnett, Richard Goldstein, Victoria A. Reder, Ellen Sherman
Citations263
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score19.08
SNIP13.47

TL;DR

It is concluded that identification of sensitive predictors of complications and specific predictor of mortality can lead to more efficient and effective ICU practices.

Abstract

To evaluate current practices regarding intensive-care units (ICU's), we collected data on 2693 consecutive admissions to a medical ICU during a two-year period and studied indications for admission, specific interventions, costs, and outcomes. The need for noninvasive monitoring rather than immediate major interventions prompted 77 per cent of the admissions. Only 10 per cent of monitored patients had subsequent indications for major interventions. The 23 per cent who required immediate interventions accounted for disproportionate shares of total charges (37 per cent) and deaths during hospitalization (58 per cent). Demographic and diagnostic data indicate that the aged and chronically ill have become the principal consumers of intensive care. Overall mortality during hospitalization was 10 per cent; cumulative mortality during follow-up study (mean duration, 15 months) was 25 per cent. We conclude that identification of sensitive predictors of complications and specific predictors of mortality can lead to more efficient and effective ICU practices.

Keywords

MedicineHealth Professions